Skip to main content

What is the Future for Manual Testing?


The Manual testing is considered as the preliminary testing phase which generally evaluates the behavior of the app developed, by performing the step by step assessment of the requirement specification analysis record. The prime objective of manual testing is to ensure that the app works extraordinarily and fine without any sort of bugs and functional defects and also as per the requirement specification documents.




Well, the future of manual testing tends to bit closer and closer to Software Development in functioning and requirements. The modification and operational developments in manual testing prove that it is necessary for manual testers for improving their skills and daily working styles.

The testers who stick on Manual testing processes only should update their skills with new technologies and automation testing frameworks, in terms of development/special testing tools, leadership qualities, logical thinking, and process analysis. Now the query may arise in your mind is what the testers are expected to do is:
  • To augment their skills and be more aware of the programming critical concepts and how the development works.
  • Aware of how the code works.
  • Learn more about how the business functions to improve ROI.
  • Capacity to indulge in management activities.
These are the crucial steps that make them up to the level of a Test Analyst virtually like the responsibilities of a Subject Matter Expert[SME]. Hence, manual testing always exists along with all the fresh and new automation testing tools introduced and will long last with all its basic conception to be developed and used with needful changes in every Software Development/Web App development process. Automation Testing and Manual Testing will complement each other for a long time to come.



To conclude or in short, there is no absolute substitute for manual testing. For performing test activities like load testing, regression testing, and performance testing the automation has become essential. Without manual testing, the testing process will not be complete and there is the possibility of functional issues if we are less bothered about the manual testing procedure.

Manual testing is much more reliable than test automation and skills such as inference, inductive reasoning, and human intuition are used while the manual testing process fashioned. Automation can’t completely replace these factors.

Follow me on:

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Scope of Automation Testing or Manual Testing in the Future?

Scope of automation testing in the future E ver since technology is progressing at a speedy pace, the demand for getting projects done quicker has increased more than ever. To get projects done fast, the complete procedures followed during a software life cycle needs to become accelerated as well. In the area of software testing, automation can be implemented to save cost and time but only when used in time-taking projects. When it comes to performing regression testing, large scale testing, automation testing is the way to go. It can be a good choice. There are a number of necessary advantages from test automation like Increases the software quality, lessens manual software testing operations and eradicate redundant testing efforts, create extra systematic repeatable software tests, Minimising repetitive work, and generate more consistent testing outcomes, higher consistency.  Execute more software tests and accomplish better testing coverage in a very limited sche
18 comments
Read more

Top 10 UI Automation Tools You Should Try

As applications are designed and developed for varied platforms, spanning mobile, desktop, and cloud. Testing the user interface has turned into an increasingly complicated and risk-prone job. While having its series of challenges and loopholes, automated UI testing is gaining traction. UI test tools can effortlessly help in automated tests of software and applications that contain user interfaces.  These mind-blowing software testing tools utilize test cases to make sure that the software and application meet its specification and performs the proposed functions. Such test automation tools not only provide smart automation but also offer intelligent analytics to address any test challenges. Statistics Overview Some stats that prove that UI should not be taken lightly ever: • By 2020, there will be around 6.1 billion Smartphone users • 75% of all site traffic at present mainly runs through search engine-Google • 90% of audiences stopped using applicat
9 comments
Read more

What is the difference between TestNG and Maven?

TestNG and Maven  are two entirely  different  things. TestNG is a testing framework inspired from NUnit and JUnit but presenting some new functionality that makes it simply easy, effortless, and powerful to use. TestNG is also an open-source automated test framework; wherein NG of TestNG signifies Next Generation. TestNG is exactly the same as JUnit but it is much more robust than JUnit but still, it’s inspired by JUnit.  This is specifically well-designed to be better than JUnit, particularly when testing integrated classes. TestNG eradicate most of the negative traits of the older framework and gives the developer the ability to write powerful and flexible tests with help of easy annotations, sequencing, grouping, & parametrizing. Benefits of TestNG Some of the major advantages of TestNG are : Annotations made testers life simple Test cases can be Grouped & Prioritized more easily Gives the ability to produce HTML Reports of execution The possibility of the
Post a Comment
Read more